So, after dispensing with both their managers services, despite relatively succesful seasons, it appears Chelsea and Manchester City are after the same man to transform their fortunes.
His name in Mark Hughes, a man who slowly has built a reputation as one of the brightest young managers in the game.
Hughes did brilliantly in his first management job, transforming Wales from an awful national side to a team fighting for a place in Euro 2004, only to be defeated by Russia in the playoffs despite beating Italy en route. Nonetheless, an impressive achievement.
Next came Blackburn, as the lure of day to day management became too much. And Hughes contiuned to impress, taking Blackburn to FA Cup Semi Finals, and three top 10 finishes, including one 6th place finish, taking Rovers into Europe.
His shrewdness in the transfer market has also been something to admire, with Benni McCarthy, Roque Santa Cruz, and David Bentley being rather astute signings indeed.
Hughes builds teams in his own image: tough, hard to play against, but with plenty of guile and class. As a player he proved capable of winning trophies and, although he hasn't won any silverware yet as a manager, it seems to be a matter of time.
But is Manchester City the right move for Mark Hughes? In my opinion, yes.
Looking at Blackburn, Hughes has taken them as far as they can go. Realistically, there's no chance of breaking into the elusive 'big 4', not with their crowds or budget.
Compare that to Manchester City, who have the financial clout, the big shiny stadium, and the big fanbase to gatecrash the big 4 party.
No contest.
Yes, City is being ran by a madman, who could well sack Hughes by Christmas if things arent going his way. If so, so what? He's just another victim of a ridiculous regime - it wouldnt tarnish his reputation too much. Succeed and Hughes is a hero, his glowing reputation furthered.
Hughes has achieved all he can at Blackburn, now is the time to jump ship, albiet to an unsteady one.
No comments:
Post a Comment